On Sat, Mar 8, 2014 at 5:58 AM, Jim J. Jewett wrote:
>
> (Thu Mar 6 23:26:47 CET 2014) Chris Angelico responded:
>
>> On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 7:29 AM, Jim J. Jewett
>> wrote:
>
>>> [ note that "x if y" already occurs in multiple contexts, and
>>> always evaluates y before x. ]
>
>> Yes, but tha
(Thu Mar 6 23:26:47 CET 2014) Chris Angelico responded:
> On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 7:29 AM, Jim J. Jewett wrote:
>> [ note that "x if y" already occurs in multiple contexts, and
>> always evaluates y before x. ]
> Yes, but that's still out of order.
Yeah, but local consistency is more impo
On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 7:29 AM, Jim J. Jewett wrote:
>
> The PEP currently says:
>
>> Alternative Proposals
>> =
>
>> Discussion on python-ideas brought up the following syntax suggestions::
>
>>value = expr except default if Exception [as e]
>
> This one was rejected becau
The PEP currently says:
> Alternative Proposals
> =
> Discussion on python-ideas brought up the following syntax suggestions::
>value = expr except default if Exception [as e]
This one was rejected because of the out-of-order evaluation.
Note, however, that the (fart
