On Sun, 25 Jan 2009 02:33:37 pm Raymond Hettinger wrote:
> > Raymond Hettinger wrote:
> >> Since I expect students to be among the users for the comb/perm
> >> functions, there is some merit to keeping the API as simple as
> >> possible. Besides, it is not hard to use the existing tool as a
> >> p
Raymond Hettinger wrote:
Since I expect students to be among the users for the comb/perm
functions, there is some merit to keeping the API as simple as possible.
Besides, it is not hard to use the existing tool as a primitive to get to
the one you want:
def mycombinations(iterable, r_seq):
Raymond Hettinger wrote:
> Since I expect students to be among the users for the comb/perm
> functions, there is some merit to keeping the API as simple as possible.
> Besides, it is not hard to use the existing tool as a primitive to get to
> the one you want:
>
> def mycombinations(iterable,
From: "Konrad Delong"
I'm not sure if it's the right place to post it. If so - I'll be glad
to learn where is one.
Please post a feature request on the bug tracker and assign it to me.
Anyway:
I think the function itertools.combinations would benefit from making
the 'r' (length of the combi
I'm not sure if it's the right place to post it. If so - I'll be glad
to learn where is one.
Anyway:
I think the function itertools.combinations would benefit from making
the 'r' (length of the combinations) argument optionally a sequence.
With that change one could call combinations(sequence, [2,
