Re: [Python-Dev] AST reverts PEP 342 implementation and IDLE starts working again

2005-10-23 Thread Raymond Hettinger
[Phillip J. Eby] > your observation actually means that the bug, if any, was somewhere > else, or was inadvertently fixed or hidden by the AST branch merge. What a nice side benefit :-) Raymond ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://

Re: [Python-Dev] AST reverts PEP 342 implementation and IDLE starts working again

2005-10-22 Thread Phillip J. Eby
At 01:30 AM 10/23/2005 -0400, Raymond Hettinger wrote: >FWIW, a few months ago, I reported that File New or File Open in IDLE >would crash Python as a result of the check-in implementing PEP 342. >Now, with AST checked-in, IDLE has started working again. Given the >reconfirmation, I recommend that

[Python-Dev] AST reverts PEP 342 implementation and IDLE starts working again

2005-10-22 Thread Raymond Hettinger
FWIW, a few months ago, I reported that File New or File Open in IDLE would crash Python as a result of the check-in implementing PEP 342. Now, with AST checked-in, IDLE has started working again. Given the reconfirmation, I recommend that the 342 patch be regarded as suspect and not be restored u