On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 5:30 PM, Alexander Belopolsky
wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 5:18 PM, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> ..
>>
>> It would be really cool if you fixed this!
>>
> Working on it. Stay tuned. :-)
>
See http://bugs.python.org/issue10224
___
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 5:18 PM, Barry Warsaw wrote:
..
>
> It would be really cool if you fixed this!
>
Working on it. Stay tuned. :-)
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
h
On Oct 28, 2010, at 04:57 PM, Alexander Belopolsky wrote:
>On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 4:52 PM, Alexander Belopolsky
> wrote:
>> On the second look, the problem may not be that bad ...
>
>Nope, the problem is even worse. It looks like Sphinx in py3k
>requires 2.x python:
>
>$ ../python.exe tools/sphi
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 4:52 PM, Alexander Belopolsky
wrote:
> On the second look, the problem may not be that bad ...
Nope, the problem is even worse. It looks like Sphinx in py3k
requires 2.x python:
$ ../python.exe tools/sphinx-build.py -b doctest -d build/doctrees -D
latex_paper_size= . bu
On the second look, the problem may not be that bad - "make doctest"
picks up system python instead of the one from the source tree. I'll
try to figure out how to rerun the doctests properly.
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 4:48 PM, Alexander Belopolsky
wrote:
> I have just discovered that sphinx suppor
I have just discovered that sphinx supports running doctests embedded
in ReST documentation. It looks like it is as simple as "cd Doc;
make doctest". The result, however is not encouraging:
$ make doctest
...
Doctest summary
===
1162 tests
262 failures in tests
0 failures in
