Nick Coghlan gmail.com> writes:
> My other question is whether or not it would be worth having the logging
> module able to export it's *current* configuration in dictionary form. I
> don't have a use case other than that it might be useful for debugging
> logging configuration errors when attemp
Vinay Sajip yahoo.co.uk> writes:
> Perhaps TypeError, too.
Sorry, brainfade there. I already mentioned TypeError in the original post :-)
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscr
Nick Coghlan gmail.com> writes:
> Since part of the purpose of this new configuration option is to allow
> other projects to use it as a target for specifying a logging
> configuration, maintaining it as a formal PEP seems like a good idea to
> me. This is already done for a few other standard-is
Vinay Sajip wrote:
> A little while ago, I posted here a suggestion about a new way to configure
> logging, using dictionaries. This received some positive and no negative
> feedback, so I have thought some more about the details of how it might work.
> I
> present below the results of that thinki
A little while ago, I posted here a suggestion about a new way to configure
logging, using dictionaries. This received some positive and no negative
feedback, so I have thought some more about the details of how it might work. I
present below the results of that thinking, in a PEP-style format. I d
