On Fri, 13 Apr 2012 18:29:10 +0200
Victor Stinner wrote:
> > The descriptions should really stress the scope of the result's
> > validity. My guess (or wish :-)) would be:
> >
> > - time.monotonic(): system-wide results, comparable from one process to
> > another
> > - time.perf_counter(): proces
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 11:29, Victor Stinner
> I will move the precision of monotonic clock of Windows 9x info into this
> table.
I would just remove it entirely. It's not relevant since it's not supported.
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python
> The descriptions should really stress the scope of the result's
> validity. My guess (or wish :-)) would be:
>
> - time.monotonic(): system-wide results, comparable from one process to
> another
> - time.perf_counter(): process-wide results, comparable from one thread
> to another (?)
> - time.
Hello,
I'm just starting a new thread since the old ones are so crowded.
First, overall I think the PEP is starting to look really good and
insightful! (congratulations to Victor)
I have a couple of comments, mostly small ones:
> "function" (str): name of the underlying operating system functio
