Re: [Python-Dev] 3.0 buildbots all red

2008-03-19 Thread Tim Golden
Trent Nelson wrote: >>> Sounds like a challenge if ever I've heard one -- care to wager a beer on >>> it? >>> (Only applies to buildbots that are connected/online.) > >> Make sure you get a screen shot for OnYourDesktop if/when they *do* go >> green! > > Screenshot? I'm going to buy a pack of i

Re: [Python-Dev] 3.0 buildbots all red

2008-03-18 Thread Trent Nelson
> > Sounds like a challenge if ever I've heard one -- care to wager a beer on > > it? > > (Only applies to buildbots that are connected/online.) > Make sure you get a screen shot for OnYourDesktop if/when they *do* go > green! Screenshot? I'm going to buy a pack of iron-on transfers and sell t-

Re: [Python-Dev] 3.0 buildbots all red

2008-03-18 Thread Steve Holden
Trent Nelson wrote: >>> New sprint idea: getting all (inc. trunk) the buildbots green by >> Thursday. Anyone interested? >> >> I think the chance to achieve that is close to zero. > > Sounds like a challenge if ever I've heard one -- care to wager a beer on it? > (Only applies to buildbots that

Re: [Python-Dev] 3.0 buildbots all red

2008-03-16 Thread Trent Nelson
> As it turns out, it's not memory related, but has to do with > tokenize not supporting coding cookies in files. > Mark picked up on this and linked it to an issue already > in roundup that was raised way back in 2003: > http://bugs.python.org/issue71988. Oops, left off an 8. That's meant to rea

Re: [Python-Dev] 3.0 buildbots all red

2008-03-16 Thread Trent Nelson
_ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of ocean [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 17 March 2008 01:34 To: Neal Norwitz; Mark Dickinson Cc: Python Dev Subject: Re: [Python-Dev] 3.0 buildbots all red > Yeah, sounds like a memory issue. Did you try running with valgrind > or purif

Re: [Python-Dev] 3.0 buildbots all red

2008-03-16 Thread ocean
> Yeah, sounds like a memory issue. Did you try running with valgrind > or purify? I haven't done so for a long time, perhaps never on 3k > branch. It would be a good thing to run a tool soon. Maybe is this related? [Potential overflows due to incorrect usage of PyUnicode_AsString] http://bugs

Re: [Python-Dev] 3.0 buildbots all red

2008-03-16 Thread Mark Dickinson
On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 7:19 PM, Trent Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yeah test_tokenize is weird, I've been looking into it as well. Here's a > sample failure from a Windows buildbot: > [failure log snipped...] > On that first line, 'f' is lib/test/tokenize_tests.txt, so basically, it's >

Re: [Python-Dev] 3.0 buildbots all red

2008-03-16 Thread Trent Nelson
rojects\python\branches\py3k\lib\encodings\cp1252.py", line 23, in decode return codecs.charmap_decode(input,self.errors,decoding_table)[0] UnicodeDecodeError: 'charmap' codec can't decode byte 0x81 in position 17: character maps to *********************

Re: [Python-Dev] 3.0 buildbots all red

2008-03-16 Thread Neal Norwitz
On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 5:13 PM, Mark Dickinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 1:32 PM, Neal Norwitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > I think this is possible, though considerable work. Probably the > > biggest win will be creating a mock for socket and using mock socke

Re: [Python-Dev] 3.0 buildbots all red

2008-03-16 Thread Mark Dickinson
On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 1:32 PM, Neal Norwitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I think this is possible, though considerable work. Probably the > biggest win will be creating a mock for socket and using mock sockets > in the tests for asyn{core,chat}, smtplib, xmlrpc, etc. That will fix > about 75%

Re: [Python-Dev] 3.0 buildbots all red

2008-03-16 Thread Neal Norwitz
On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 12:07 PM, "Martin v. Löwis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>> New sprint idea: getting all (inc. trunk) the buildbots green by > >> Thursday. Anyone interested? > >> > >> I think the chance to achieve that is close to zero. > > > > Sounds like a challenge if ever I've h

Re: [Python-Dev] 3.0 buildbots all red

2008-03-16 Thread Martin v. Löwis
>>> New sprint idea: getting all (inc. trunk) the buildbots green by >> Thursday. Anyone interested? >> >> I think the chance to achieve that is close to zero. > > Sounds like a challenge if ever I've heard one -- care to wager a > beer on it? (Only applies to buildbots that are connected/onlin

Re: [Python-Dev] 3.0 buildbots all red

2008-03-16 Thread Barry Warsaw
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Mar 16, 2008, at 10:48 AM, Martin v. Lšwis wrote: >> New sprint idea: getting all (inc. trunk) the buildbots green by >> Thursday. Anyone interested? > > I think the chance to achieve that is close to zero. How broken do you want the next month

Re: [Python-Dev] 3.0 buildbots all red

2008-03-16 Thread Trent Nelson
> > New sprint idea: getting all (inc. trunk) the buildbots green by > Thursday. Anyone interested? > > I think the chance to achieve that is close to zero. Sounds like a challenge if ever I've heard one -- care to wager a beer on it? (Only applies to buildbots that are connected/online.) (FWI

Re: [Python-Dev] 3.0 buildbots all red

2008-03-16 Thread Martin v. Lšwis
> New sprint idea: getting all (inc. trunk) the buildbots green by Thursday. > Anyone interested? I think the chance to achieve that is close to zero. Regards, Martin ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/lis

[Python-Dev] 3.0 buildbots all red

2008-03-16 Thread Trent Nelson
http://www.python.org/dev/buildbot/3.0/ New sprint idea: getting all (inc. trunk) the buildbots green by Thursday. Anyone interested? Trent. ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev