"Neal Norwitz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Here's what's left for 2.5 after the most recent go around.
>
> There's no owner for these items. If no one takes them, they won't
> get done and I will move them to deferred within a week:
>
> * Add @decorator decorator to functional, rename to func
Neal Norwitz wrote:
> Here's what's left for 2.5 after the most recent go around.
>
> There's no owner for these items. If no one takes them, they won't
> get done and I will move them to deferred within a week:
>
> * Add @decorator decorator to functional, rename to functools?
> What's th
Collin Winter wrote:
> I'd very much like to see functional renamed to functools, and I've
> cooked up the necessary changes to handle the move (SF #1478788).
+1 since there are utilities like "decorator" and "deprecated" which belong in
such a module, but don't fit within the "functional program
[Georg Brandl]
>> As I posted here previously, I contacted the owner, and he said that he
>> didn't care about specifying a license. I guess that means that we can
>> pick one ;)
[Martin v. Löwis]
> Can you please ask whether he would be willing to fill out a contrib
> form (http://www.python.org/
On 4/28/06, Neal Norwitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There's no owner for these items. If no one takes them, they won't
> get done and I will move them to deferred within a week:
>
> * Add @decorator decorator to functional, rename to functools?
> What's the benefit of @decorator? Who made
Here's what's left for 2.5 after the most recent go around.
There's no owner for these items. If no one takes them, they won't
get done and I will move them to deferred within a week:
* Add @decorator decorator to functional, rename to functools?
What's the benefit of @decorator? Who made
Georg Brandl wrote:
> As I posted here previously, I contacted the owner, and he said that he
> didn't care about specifying a license. I guess that means that we can
> pick one ;)
Can you please ask whether he would be willing to fill out a contrib
form (http://www.python.org/psf/contrib/contrib-
Georg Brandl wrote:
> Martin v. Löwis wrote:
>> Neal Norwitz wrote:
>>> Who is the owner for getting new icons installed with the new logo?
>> Nobody, so far (for Windows). Somebody should contact the owner and
>> find out what the license on this work is, and then tell me what
>> to do with them.
Martin v. Löwis wrote:
> Neal Norwitz wrote:
>> Who is the owner for getting new icons installed with the new logo?
>
> Nobody, so far (for Windows). Somebody should contact the owner and
> find out what the license on this work is, and then tell me what
> to do with them. I assume the py and pyc
Ronald Oussoren wrote:
> That's fine by me. I'll be adding them to the universal python 2.4
> tree soon and to 2.5 when that's is done. Do have to wait for the
> contributor agreement, which the folks over at [EMAIL PROTECTED] say is
> good enough, to do that?
If the artist has informally ag
On 28-apr-2006, at 17:41, Martin v. Löwis wrote:
>
>
>>> - Support for building "fat" Mac binaries (Intel and PPC)
>>> (Owner: Ronald Oussoren)
>>
>> Yes, this would be cool.
>
> This is nearly committed. For some reason, SF apparently dropped
> my last change request for it, and Ro
On 28-apr-2006, at 17:07, Martin v. Löwis wrote:
> Neal Norwitz wrote:
>> Who is the owner for getting new icons installed with the new logo?
>
> For the OSX icons, I guess Ronald Oussoren owns the task of getting
> them into the distribution.
That's fine by me. I'll be adding them to the univer
At 11:54 AM 4/28/2006 -0400, A.M. Kuchling wrote:
>On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 11:02:07AM -0400, Phillip J. Eby wrote:
> > I doubt I'll have time to write documentation for it before alpha 3. If
> > it's okay for the docs to wait for one of the beta releases -- or better
> > yet, if someone could volu
On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 11:02:07AM -0400, Phillip J. Eby wrote:
> I doubt I'll have time to write documentation for it before alpha 3. If
> it's okay for the docs to wait for one of the beta releases -- or better
> yet, if someone could volunteer to create rough draft documentation that I
> cou
Guido van Rossum wrote:
>> - bdist_deb in distutils package
>> (Owner: ???)
>> http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-February/060926.html
>
> Isn't that MvL?
I spoke in favour of including it, but don't recall ever to committing
as a "sponsor/second" of including
Thomas Heller wrote:
> I was fearing it is getting too long. How many pages do you expect
> or will you tolerate (yes, this is a serious question)?
I don't think there should be a page limit to documentation. If it is
structured into sections, then size simply doesn't matter on the Web:
people ca
Neal Norwitz wrote:
> Who is the owner for getting new icons installed with the new logo?
Nobody, so far (for Windows). Somebody should contact the owner and
find out what the license on this work is, and then tell me what
to do with them. I assume the py and pyc icons are to be replaced, and I
al
At 07:38 AM 4/28/2006 -0700, Guido van Rossum wrote:
>On 4/28/06, A.M. Kuchling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > - wsgiref to the standard library
> > (Owner: Phillip Eby)
>
>I still hope this can go in; it will help web framework authors do the
>right thing long term.
I doubt I'll hav
On 4/28/06, A.M. Kuchling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There are also these items in the 'possible features' section:
>
> Modules under consideration for inclusion:
>
> - bdist_deb in distutils package
> (Owner: ???)
> http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-d
On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 10:58:49PM -0700, Neal Norwitz wrote:
> If you are addressed on this message, it means you have open issues
> that need to be resolved for 2.5. Some of these issues are
> documentation, others are code issues. This information comes from
> PEP 356.
There are also these it
On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 10:27:45AM +0200, Thomas Heller wrote:
> I could imagine three parts of the ctypes docs:
...
> 3. Some articles/howtos which cover advanced issues.
Note that there's now a Doc/howto directory, so you could put articles
there. The howtos aren't built as part of the docume
Neal Norwitz wrote:
> If you are addressed on this message, it means you have open issues
> that need to be resolved for 2.5. Some of these issues are
> documentation, others are code issues.
> Documentation missing:
> +++
> Fredrik: ElementTree
> Gerhard: pysqlite
> Martin: msili
If you are addressed on this message, it means you have open issues
that need to be resolved for 2.5. Some of these issues are
documentation, others are code issues. This information comes from
PEP 356. The best way to get me to stop bugging you is to close out
these tasks. :-)
Who is the owner
23 matches
Mail list logo
