Tim Peters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [sorry for the near-duplicate msgs -- looks like gmail lied when it claimed
> the
> first msg was still in "draft" status]
>
>>> Did you add a test to ensure this remains fixed?
>
> [mwh]
>> Yup.
>
> Bless you. Did you attach a contributor agreement and
[sorry for the near-duplicate msgs -- looks like gmail lied when it claimed the
first msg was still in "draft" status]
>> Did you add a test to ensure this remains fixed?
[mwh]
> Yup.
Bless you. Did you attach a contributor agreement and mark the test
as being contributed under said contributo
Tim Peters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [Michael Hudson]
>> ...
>> Well, I fixed it on reading the bug report and before getting to
>> python-dev mail :) Sorry if this duplicated your work, but hey, it was
>> only a two line change...
>
> Na, the real work was tracking it down in the bowels of Zo
[Michael Hudson]
> ...
> Well, I fixed it on reading the bug report and before getting to
> python-dev mail :) Sorry if this duplicated your work, but hey, it was
> only a two line change...
Na, the real work was tracking it down in the bowels of Zope's C-coded
security machinery -- we'll let you
[Michael Hudson]
> ...
> Well, I fixed it on reading the bug report and before getting to
> python-dev mail :) Sorry if this duplicated your work, but hey, it was
> only a two line change...
Na, the real work was tracking it down in the bowels of Zope's C-coded
security machinery -- we'll let you
Tim Peters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Rev 2.66 of funcobject.c made func.__name__ writable for the first
> time. That's great, but the patch also introduced what I'm pretty
> sure was an unintended incompatibility: after 2.66, func.__name__ was
> no longer *readable* in restricted execution m
Rev 2.66 of funcobject.c made func.__name__ writable for the first
time. That's great, but the patch also introduced what I'm pretty
sure was an unintended incompatibility: after 2.66, func.__name__ was
no longer *readable* in restricted execution mode. I can't think of a
good reason to restrict
