> If "real" and "imag" are themselves complex numbers, then normalizing
> the result will move the imaginary portion of the "real" vector into
> the imaginary part and vice versa.
Not quite.
>>> complex(1,1j)
0j
>>> complex(0,1j)
(-1+0j)
So it moves the imaginary portion of the "imag" argument i
"Jim Jewett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Tim Peters wrote:
>
> > complex_new() ends with:
>
> > cr.real -= ci.imag;
> > cr.imag += ci.real;
>
> > and I have no idea what that thinks it's doing. Surely this isn't
> > intended?!
> :
>
> I think it is. python.org/sf/1642844 adds c
Tim Peters wrote:
> complex_new() ends with:
> cr.real -= ci.imag;
> cr.imag += ci.real;
> and I have no idea what that thinks it's doing. Surely this isn't intended?!:
I think it is. python.org/sf/1642844 adds comments to make it less unclear.
> >>> complex(complex(1.0, 2.0),
