Brian Curtin wrote:
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 1:28 PM, Jesus Cea wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 23/07/12 19:30, Eli Bendersky wrote:
That said, we could probably merge Doc/ACKS and Misc/ACKS (*).
There doesn't seem to be any strong argument for separating doc
contributi
> Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2012 19:17:32 +0200
> From: Antoine Pitrou
> To: python-dev@python.org
> Subject: [Python-Dev] Doc/ACKS and Misc/ACKS
>
>> > Doc/ACKS.txt is *only* for acknowledging documentation
>> > contributions. Serhiy is already in Misc/ACKS. No nee
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 1:28 PM, Jesus Cea wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 23/07/12 19:30, Eli Bendersky wrote:
>>> That said, we could probably merge Doc/ACKS and Misc/ACKS (*).
>>> There doesn't seem to be any strong argument for separating doc
>>> contributions f
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 23/07/12 19:30, Eli Bendersky wrote:
>> That said, we could probably merge Doc/ACKS and Misc/ACKS (*).
>> There doesn't seem to be any strong argument for separating doc
>> contributions from other contributions.
>>
>> (*) I think perhaps Éric alre
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 12:17 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Jul 2012 18:38:30 +0200
> Jesus Cea wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> On 23/07/12 18:27, Meador Inge wrote:
>> > Doc/ACKS.txt is *only* for acknowledging documentation
>> > contributions. Serhiy i
>> On 23/07/12 18:27, Meador Inge wrote:
>> > Doc/ACKS.txt is *only* for acknowledging documentation
>> > contributions. Serhiy is already in Misc/ACKS. No need to add him
>> > to Doc/ACKS.txt.
>>
>> Oh, I missed that. Thanks for the head up.
>
> That said, we could probably merge Doc/ACKS and Mis
On Mon, 23 Jul 2012 18:38:30 +0200
Jesus Cea wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 23/07/12 18:27, Meador Inge wrote:
> > Doc/ACKS.txt is *only* for acknowledging documentation
> > contributions. Serhiy is already in Misc/ACKS. No need to add him
> > to Doc/ACKS.txt.
>
