Phillip J. Eby:
> did you ever try using IPython, and confirm whether it
> does or does not address the issue
As I understand it, using IPython (or otherwise changing
the interactive mode) works fine *if* you just want a point
solution -- get something up in some environment chosen
by the develop
Michiel Jan Laurens de Hoon wrote:
> There are several other reasons why the alternative solutions that came
> up in this discussion are more attractive than IPython:
> 1) AFAICT, IPython is not intended to work with IDLE.
Not so far, but mostly by accident. The necessary changes are fairly easy
Phillip J. Eby wrote:
> At 06:48 PM 11/15/2005 -0500, Michiel Jan Laurens de Hoon wrote:
>
>> Thanks everybody for contributing to this discussion. I didn't expect it
>> to become this extensive.
>> I think that by now, everybody has had their chance to voice their
>> opinion.
>> It seems safe to
At 06:48 PM 11/15/2005 -0500, Michiel Jan Laurens de Hoon wrote:
>Thanks everybody for contributing to this discussion. I didn't expect it
>to become this extensive.
>I think that by now, everybody has had their chance to voice their opinion.
>It seems safe to conclude that there is no consensus on
Thanks everybody for contributing to this discussion. I didn't expect it
to become this extensive.
I think that by now, everybody has had their chance to voice their opinion.
It seems safe to conclude that there is no consensus on this topic.
So what I'm planning to do is to write a small extensi
