Martin v. Löwis wrote:
>> But in my current position and with "I-do-software-developement-too",
>> you are just pissing me off for not fixing a bug in your program with a 10
>> lines long patch written by someone else 3 years ago.
>
> Unfortunately, it is not obvious to me that the patch is correc
On Dec 19, 2009, at 5:29 AM, Julien Danjou wrote:
> Well, that's disapointing. I work on several other free software
> projects, and my time is really scarce too.
>
> I understand blackmailing me to close a bug can be seen as a nice game.
> Honestly, if I had more time to get involve in that are
At 1261181806 time_t, "Martin v. Löwis" wrote:
> Only if some committer finds time for it, which is *really* scarce.
> If you want to push that issue, I promise to review it after you have
> reviewed five other patches.
Well, that's disapointing. I work on several other free software
projects, and
> But in my current position and with "I-do-software-developement-too",
> you are just pissing me off for not fixing a bug in your program with a 10
> lines long patch written by someone else 3 years ago.
Unfortunately, it is not obvious to me that the patch is correct, so I
couldn't check it in a
Julien Danjou wrote:
> At 1261178549 time_t, Martin v. Löwis wrote:
>>> Is there to chance to see this *bug* fixed someday?
>> Please ask on python-dev. I may be willing to revive my five-for-one offer.
>
> Not sure I really understand, but I can ask gain here:
> will that patch, which seems corre
Julien Danjou wrote:
> At 1261178549 time_t, Martin v. Löwis wrote:
>>> Is there to chance to see this *bug* fixed someday?
>> Please ask on python-dev. I may be willing to revive my five-for-one offer.
>
> Not sure I really understand, but I can ask gain here:
> will that patch, which seems corre
At 1261178549 time_t, Martin v. Löwis wrote:
> > Is there to chance to see this *bug* fixed someday?
>
> Please ask on python-dev. I may be willing to revive my five-for-one offer.
Not sure I really understand, but I can ask gain here:
will that patch, which seems correct finally merged and get t
