Re: [Python-Dev] [Web-SIG] Backup plan: WSGI 1 Addenda and wsgiref update for Py3

At 12:55 PM 9/21/2010 -0400, Ian Bicking wrote: On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 12:47 PM, Chris McDonough <chr...@plope.com> wrote: On Tue, 2010-09-21 at 12:09 -0400, P.J. Eby wrote: > While the Web-SIG is trying to hash out PEP 444, I thought it would > be a good idea to have a

Re: [Python-Dev] [Web-SIG] Backup plan: WSGI 1 Addenda and wsgiref update for Py3

On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 12:09 PM, P.J. Eby wrote: > The Python 3 specific changes are to use: > > * ``bytes`` for I/O streams in both directions > * ``str`` for environ keys and values > * ``bytes`` for arguments to start_response() and write() > This is the only thing that seems odd to me -- it

Re: [Python-Dev] [Web-SIG] Backup plan: WSGI 1 Addenda and wsgiref update for Py3

On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 12:47 PM, Chris McDonough wrote: > On Tue, 2010-09-21 at 12:09 -0400, P.J. Eby wrote: > > While the Web-SIG is trying to hash out PEP 444, I thought it would > > be a good idea to have a backup plan that would allow the Python 3 > > stdlib to move forward, without needing

Re: [Python-Dev] [Web-SIG] Backup plan: WSGI 1 Addenda and wsgiref update for Py3

On Tue, 2010-09-21 at 12:09 -0400, P.J. Eby wrote: > While the Web-SIG is trying to hash out PEP 444, I thought it would > be a good idea to have a backup plan that would allow the Python 3 > stdlib to move forward, without needing a major new spec to settle > out implementation questions. If a