Alexander Belopolsky writes:
> On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 10:04 PM, Stephen J. Turnbull
> wrote:
> > ... On the original question, I
> > think it's preferable to keep compilers happy unless you're willing to
> > *require* C99.
>
> Hmm, maybe I should take another look at http://bugs.python.o
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 10:04 PM, Stephen J. Turnbull
wrote:
> ... On the original question, I
> think it's preferable to keep compilers happy unless you're willing to
> *require* C99.
Hmm, maybe I should take another look at http://bugs.python.org/issue4805 .
Note that issue #10359 was not abo
Alexander Belopolsky writes:
> On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 7:28 AM, Victor Stinner
> wrote:
> ..
> > I don't know, but the commit is trivial and cheap. If it improves the
> > support
> > on uncommon compiler, I agree to commit such change.
> >
>
> But it does it at the cost of invalidating
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 7:28 AM, Victor Stinner
wrote:
..
> I don't know, but the commit is trivial and cheap. If it improves the support
> on uncommon compiler, I agree to commit such change.
>
But it does it at the cost of invalidating the "svn blame" for the
last enum entry now and for future
On Tuesday 09 November 2010 17:23:23 Alexander Belopolsky wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 4:39 AM, victor.stinner
> wrote:
> ..
>
> > Log:
> > Issue #10359: Remove useless comma, invalid in ISO C
>
> C99 allows it. Which compiler is giving you trouble?
I don't know, but the commit is trivial a
On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 4:39 AM, victor.stinner
wrote:
..
> Log:
> Issue #10359: Remove useless comma, invalid in ISO C
C99 allows it. Which compiler is giving you trouble?
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman
