> Is it possible to pin the autoconf version (not just floor it)?
Not that I know of, no.
> Should we appoint an autoconf BDFL who can commit changes after configure.in
> is changed?
Most recently, it was between me and Benjamin most of the time, and that
seems to have worked fine. Now Benjami
On Oct 14, 2010, at 09:11 PM, Martin v. Löwis wrote:
>> I don't see it as any more of a problem than upgrading against other
>> dependencies (like gcc?).
>
>Ok, so let's drop the requirement then.
Good for me. Is there a place where this requirement is documented?
-Barry
signature.asc
Descrip
> I don't see it as any more of a problem than upgrading against other
> dependencies (like gcc?).
Ok, so let's drop the requirement then.
Regards,
Martin
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-d
2010/10/14 "Martin v. Löwis" :
>>> I think it was intentional (at least deliberate), but I think it is a
>>> problem and should be reverted. There is, at any point, the official
>>> version that Python uses for autoconf, which at the moment is 2.65.
>>> The rationale is that with changing autoconf
>> I think it was intentional (at least deliberate), but I think it is a
>> problem and should be reverted. There is, at any point, the official
>> version that Python uses for autoconf, which at the moment is 2.65.
>> The rationale is that with changing autoconf versions, the actual
>> configure s
On Oct 14, 2010, at 08:27 PM, Martin v. Löwis wrote:
>I think it was intentional (at least deliberate), but I think it is a
>problem and should be reverted. There is, at any point, the official
>version that Python uses for autoconf, which at the moment is 2.65.
>The rationale is that with changin
2010/10/14 "Martin v. Löwis" :
> Am 14.10.2010 19:57, schrieb Daniel Stutzbach:
>> On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 12:38 PM, barry.warsaw
>> mailto:python-check...@python.org>> wrote:
>>
>> -# Generated by GNU Autoconf 2.65 for python 3.2.
>> +# Generated by GNU Autoconf 2.67 for python 3.2.
>>
>>
Am 14.10.2010 19:57, schrieb Daniel Stutzbach:
> On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 12:38 PM, barry.warsaw
> mailto:python-check...@python.org>> wrote:
>
> -# Generated by GNU Autoconf 2.65 for python 3.2.
> +# Generated by GNU Autoconf 2.67 for python 3.2.
>
>
> Was the change in autoconf versions
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 12:38 PM, barry.warsaw
wrote:
> -# Generated by GNU Autoconf 2.65 for python 3.2.
> +# Generated by GNU Autoconf 2.67 for python 3.2.
>
Was the change in autoconf versions intentional and/or is it a problem?
--
Daniel Stutzbach, Ph.D.
President, Stutzbach Enterprises, LL
