> "Martin" == Martin v Löwis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Martin> Raymond Hettinger wrote:
>> Do you have an ANSI-strict option with your compiler?
Martin> gcc does have an option to force c89 compliance, but there
Martin> is a good chance that Python stops compiling with opti
Raymond Hettinger wrote:
> But we still have to get the code back to ANSI compliance.
> Do you have an ANSI-strict option with your compiler?
Please don't call this "ANSI compliant". ANSI does many more
thinks that writing C standards, and, in the specific case,
the code *is* ANSI compliant as it
[Gregory P. Smith]
> I don't have a win32 dev environment at the moment so i didn't see
> that. Sorry.
No big deal.
But we still have to get the code back to ANSI compliance.
Do you have an ANSI-strict option with your compiler?
Raymond
___
Python-D
On Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 08:46:27AM -0400, Raymond Hettinger wrote:
> > A new hashlib module to replace the md5 and sha modules. It adds
> > support for additional secure hashes such as SHA-256 and SHA-512. The
> > hashlib module uses OpenSSL for fast platform optimized
> > implementations of algo
> A new hashlib module to replace the md5 and sha modules. It adds
> support for additional secure hashes such as SHA-256 and SHA-512. The
> hashlib module uses OpenSSL for fast platform optimized
> implementations of algorithms when available. The old md5 and sha
> modules still exist as wrappe
