On 01/12/2013 02:46 PM, Eli Bendersky wrote:
The first report is legit, however. PyTuple_New(0) was called and its
return value wasn't checked for NULL.
The author might have been relying on Python caching the empty tuple.
___
Python-Dev mailing list
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 8:08 AM, Christian Heimes wrote:
> Am 11.01.2013 07:09, schrieb Nick Coghlan:
> > On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 2:57 PM, wrote:
> >> results for aef7db0d3893 on branch "default"
> >>
> >>
> >> test_dbm leaked [2, 0, 0] references, su
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 10:09 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 2:57 PM, wrote:
> > results for aef7db0d3893 on branch "default"
> >
> >
> > test_dbm leaked [2, 0, 0] references, sum=2
> > test_dbm leaked [2, 2, 1] memory blocks, sum=
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 2:57 PM, wrote:
> results for aef7db0d3893 on branch "default"
>
>
> test_dbm leaked [2, 0, 0] references, sum=2
> test_dbm leaked [2, 2, 1] memory blocks, sum=5
Hmm, I'm starting to wonder if there's something to this one - it
