On Sun, 16 Sep 2012 06:54:21 +0200
Ross Lagerwall wrote:
> On 09/16/2012 06:04 AM, solip...@pitrou.net wrote:
> > results for 1704deb7e6d7 on branch "default"
> >
> >
> > test_dbm leaked [0, 2, 0] references, sum=2
> >
>
> I've noticed that test_dbm
On 09/16/2012 06:04 AM, solip...@pitrou.net wrote:
> results for 1704deb7e6d7 on branch "default"
>
>
> test_dbm leaked [0, 2, 0] references, sum=2
>
I've noticed that test_dbm fairly often leaks here although I've never
reproduced it. Does anyone kno
