On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 8:29 PM, Barry Warsaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jul 1, 2008, at 10:42 PM, Benjamin Peterson wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 8:44 PM, Barry Warsaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> On Jul 1, 2008, at 7:27 PM, Brett Cannon wrote:
>>>
Is a Google Calendar kep
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Jul 1, 2008, at 10:42 PM, Benjamin Peterson wrote:
On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 8:44 PM, Barry Warsaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Jul 1, 2008, at 7:27 PM, Brett Cannon wrote:
Is a Google Calendar kep
On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 8:44 PM, Barry Warsaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Jul 1, 2008, at 7:27 PM, Brett Cannon wrote:
>>
>> Is a Google Calendar kept by anyone that lists stuff like planned
>> release dates, etc.?
>
> http://www.google.com/cal
On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 6:44 PM, Barry Warsaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Jul 1, 2008, at 7:27 PM, Brett Cannon wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 3:55 PM, Barry Warsaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>>> H
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Jul 1, 2008, at 7:27 PM, Brett Cannon wrote:
On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 3:55 PM, Barry Warsaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Jul 1, 2008, at 4:54 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 1:51
On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 6:27 PM, Brett Cannon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is a Google Calendar kept by anyone that lists stuff like planned
> release dates, etc.?
It's on my personal one. :)
--
Cheers,
Benjamin Peterson
"There's no place like 127.0.0.1."
___
On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 3:55 PM, Barry Warsaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Jul 1, 2008, at 4:54 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 1:51 PM, Raymond Hettinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> From: "Barry Warsaw" <[EMAIL PROTECT
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Jul 1, 2008, at 7:04 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 3:55 PM, Barry Warsaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Jul 1, 2008, at 4:54 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 1:51 PM, Raymond Hettinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 3:55 PM, Barry Warsaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jul 1, 2008, at 4:54 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 1:51 PM, Raymond Hettinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> From: "Barry Warsaw" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>
>> There are two options. I could shift every
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Jul 1, 2008, at 4:54 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 1:51 PM, Raymond Hettinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
From: "Barry Warsaw" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
There are two options. I could shift everything forward 2 weeks
and do t
On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 1:51 PM, Raymond Hettinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: "Barry Warsaw" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>> There are two options. I could shift everything forward 2 weeks and do
>> the next betas on July 16th. Or we could wait until August 6th. That
>> would mean 6 weeks bet
From: "Barry Warsaw" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
There are two options. I could shift everything forward 2 weeks and
do the next betas on July 16th. Or we could wait until August 6th.
That would mean 6 weeks between betas. It's fine with me either way.
+1 for six weeks to allow the code to be mo
On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 3:40 PM, Barry Warsaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> There are two options. I could shift everything forward 2 weeks and do the
> next betas on July 16th. Or we could wait until August 6th. That would
> mean 6 weeks between betas. It's fine with me either way.
I vote for
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Jul 1, 2008, at 4:25 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
I think we should put this one off. The previous betas were done on
June 18, and IMO the next beta should be about a month afterwards,
not 2 weeks.
I will not be able to make releases the week
On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 4:23 PM, Georg Brandl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Barry Warsaw schrieb:
>>
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Wow, I bet this one crept up on you as quickly as it did me!
>>
>> We have our second planned beta releases for 2.6 and 3.0 tomorrow. As
>>
I think we should put this one off. The previous betas were done on June 18,
and IMO the next beta should be about a month afterwards, not 2 weeks.
On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 1:16 PM, Barry Warsaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Wow, I bet this one cre
16 matches
Mail list logo
