>> What would a registry of tranformation algorithms buy us compared to a
>> module with transformation functions?
>
> Easier registering of custom transformations. Without a registry, you'd have
> to monkey-patch a module.
Or users would have to invoke the module directly.
I think a convention
Walter Dörwald schrieb:
If a PEP is called for, I'd be happy to at least co-author it.
>>> Codecs are a major exception to Guido's law: Never have a parameter
>>> whose value switches between completely unrelated algorithms.
>>
>> I don't think that applies here. This is more like __import__
Georg Brandl wrote:
> Walter Dörwald schrieb:
>> Georg Brandl wrote:
>>> Nick Coghlan schrieb:
Georg Brandl wrote:
> Guido van Rossum schrieb:
>> I've written up a comprehensive status report on Python 3000. Please
>> read:
>>
>> http://www.artima.com/weblogs/viewpost.jsp?
On 2007-06-19 14:40, Walter Dörwald wrote:
> Georg Brandl wrote:
A minuscule nit: the rot13 codec has no library equivalent, so it won't be
supported anymore :)
>>> Given that there are valid use cases for bytes-to-bytes translations,
>>> and a common API for them would be nice, does it
Georg Brandl wrote:
> Nick Coghlan schrieb:
>> Georg Brandl wrote:
>>> Guido van Rossum schrieb:
I've written up a comprehensive status report on Python 3000. Please read:
http://www.artima.com/weblogs/viewpost.jsp?thread=208549
>>> Thank you! Now I have something to show to interest
