>> There's no reason why Tal should be obstructed in his goal of making
>> IDLE at least acceptable again. It's fairly obvious thaat there aren't
>> any committers who have both the inclination /and/ the time to do this,
>> so adding Tal (and other interested parties) as a developer makes a lot
>>
On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 2:47 PM, Steve Holden wrote:
> On 7/17/2010 7:33 AM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> On Sun, 11 Jul 2010 02:05:22 +0300
>> Tal Einat wrote:
>>>
>>> I would like to propose removing IDLE from the standard library.
>>>
>>> I have been using IDLE since 2002 and have b
