David Abrahams wrote:
> This isn't rocket science. Or maybe it is; if adding
>
> These instructions only apply if you're using a version of Python
> prior to 2.4.1 with a MinGW prior to 3.0.0 (with
> binutils-2.13.90-20030111-1)
>
> is not acceptable then no patch I could submit would be a
"Martin v. Löwis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> David Abrahams wrote:
>> As it turns out, MinGW also implemented, in version 3.0.0 (with
>> binutils-2.13.90-20030111-1), features which make the creation of
>> libpython24.a unnecessary. So whoever maintains this doc might want
>> to note that you
David Abrahams wrote:
> As it turns out, MinGW also implemented, in version 3.0.0 (with
> binutils-2.13.90-20030111-1), features which make the creation of
> libpython24.a unnecessary. So whoever maintains this doc might want
> to note that you only need that step if you are using a version of
> P
David Abrahams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> "Martin v. Löwis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> David Abrahams wrote:
>>> Is the instruction at
>>> http://www.python.org/dev/doc/devel/inst/tweak-flags.html#SECTION000622000
>>> still relevant? I am not 100% certain I didn't make one my
