Fred L. Drake, Jr. wrote:
> - Pickles containing classes from the xml package will break if we're not
> really careful. But I think they're pretty fragile now.
>
> I'll be glad to make these or similar changes if there's concensus on this.
I don't agree with the change. You just broke source c
> you also broke my subversion:
>
> $ svn up
> svn: subversion/libsvn_ra_svn/marshal.c:434: vwrite_tuple: Assertion `opt ||
> cstr' failed.
> Aborted
>
> (but that's probably not your fault).
>
> has anyone seen this error? any ideas on how to fix it?
google indicated that people had seen this
On Wednesday 14 December 2005 12:13, Fredrik Lundh wrote:
> looks like you broken installation (the libinstall target hasn't been
> updated); from comp.lang.python:
Ouch! Thanks for fixing this.
> you also broke my subversion:
>
> $ svn up
> svn: subversion/libsvn_ra_svn/marshal.c:434: vwr
Fred L. Drake, Jr. wrote:
> On Tuesday 13 December 2005 18:40, A.M. Kuchling wrote:
> > +1; it's what should have been done in the first place.
>
> If only I'd understood that when I added the xml/PyXML hack to the stdlib
> years ago. :-(
>
> Fixed now. I'll deal with the documentation in a few
Fred L. Drake, Jr. wrote:
> On Tuesday 13 December 2005 18:40, A.M. Kuchling wrote:
> > +1; it's what should have been done in the first place.
>
> If only I'd understood that when I added the xml/PyXML hack to the stdlib
> years ago. :-(
>
> Fixed now. I'll deal with the documentation in a f
On Tuesday 13 December 2005 18:40, A.M. Kuchling wrote:
> +1; it's what should have been done in the first place.
If only I'd understood that when I added the xml/PyXML hack to the stdlib
years ago. :-(
Fixed now. I'll deal with the documentation in a few days; I actually expect
to have some
On Tue, Dec 13, 2005 at 03:54:00PM -0500, Fred L. Drake, Jr. wrote:
> I'd like to propose that a new package be created in the standard library:
> xmlcore. This package should contain what's currently in the "xml" package.
+1; it's what should have been done in the first place.
--amk
__
Fred L. Drake, Jr. wrote:
> I'd like to propose that a new package be created in the standard library:
> xmlcore. This package should contain what's currently in the "xml" package.
> The xml package should be replaced with a single module that's responsible
> for the magic that xml/__init__.py
I've CC'd the XML-SIG list on this; discussion should probably continue on
python-dev since we're well into the xml package at this point.
On Tuesday 13 December 2005 15:29, Fredrik Lundh wrote:
> what's the status of PyXML? is it time to move it over to svn.python.org
> and bring it up to 1.0
