Am 26.06.2010 02:41, schrieb Stephen Thorne:
> On 2010-06-25, "Martin v. Löwis" wrote:
>>> What page were we suggesting linking to?
>>
>> I don't think anybody proposed anything specific. Steve Holden
>> suggested it should go to "reasoned discussion of the
>> pros and cons as evinced in this threa
On 2010-06-25, "Martin v. Löwis" wrote:
> > What page were we suggesting linking to?
>
> I don't think anybody proposed anything specific. Steve Holden
> suggested it should go to "reasoned discussion of the
> pros and cons as evinced in this thread". Stephen Thorne didn't
> propose anything speci
Martin v. Löwis wrote:
I am extremely keen for this to happen. Does anyone have ownership of this
project? There was some discussion of it up-list but the discussion
fizzled.
>>> Can you please explain what "this project" is, in the context of your
>>> message? GSoC? GHOP?
>> Oh, I
On 25/06/2010 22:14, "Martin v. Löwis" wrote:
What page were we suggesting linking to?
I don't think anybody proposed anything specific. Steve Holden
suggested it should go to "reasoned discussion of the
pros and cons as evinced in this thread". Stephen Thorne didn't
propose anything speci
> What page were we suggesting linking to?
I don't think anybody proposed anything specific. Steve Holden
suggested it should go to "reasoned discussion of the
pros and cons as evinced in this thread". Stephen Thorne didn't
propose anything specific but to have a large button.
> I'll move the dis
On 25/06/2010 21:27, "Martin v. Löwis" wrote:
I am extremely keen for this to happen. Does anyone have ownership of this
project? There was some discussion of it up-list but the discussion fizzled.
Can you please explain what "this project" is, in the context of your
message? GSoC? GHO
>>> I am extremely keen for this to happen. Does anyone have ownership of this
>>> project? There was some discussion of it up-list but the discussion fizzled.
>>
>> Can you please explain what "this project" is, in the context of your
>> message? GSoC? GHOP?
>
> Oh, I thought this was quite clear
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 5:34 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 11:18 AM, Terry Reedy wrote:
>> I believe there is material on the wiki as well as the two existing pages on
>> other sites that were discussed here. So a new page on python.org could
>> consist of a few links. Someone
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 11:18 AM, Terry Reedy wrote:
> I believe there is material on the wiki as well as the two existing pages on
> other sites that were discussed here. So a new page on python.org could
> consist of a few links. Someone just has to write it.
There's material on the wiki *now*
On 6/24/2010 8:31 PM, Stephen Thorne wrote:
Oh, I thought this was quite clear. I was specifically meaning the large
"Python 2 or 3" button on python.org. It would help users who want to know
what version of python to use if they had a clear guide as to what version
to download.
I think everyo
Stephen Thorne wrote:
> On 2010-06-25, "Martin v. Löwis" wrote:
>> Am 25.06.2010 01:28, schrieb Stephen Thorne:
>>> Steve Holden Wrote:
Given the amount of interest this thread has generated I can't help
wondering why it isn't more prominent in python.org content. Is the
developer co
On 2010-06-25, "Martin v. Löwis" wrote:
> Am 25.06.2010 01:28, schrieb Stephen Thorne:
> > Steve Holden Wrote:
> >> Given the amount of interest this thread has generated I can't help
> >> wondering why it isn't more prominent in python.org content. Is the
> >> developer community completely disjoi
Am 25.06.2010 01:28, schrieb Stephen Thorne:
> Steve Holden Wrote:
>> Given the amount of interest this thread has generated I can't help
>> wondering why it isn't more prominent in python.org content. Is the
>> developer community completely disjoint with the web content editor
>> community?
>>
>>
Steve Holden Wrote:
> Given the amount of interest this thread has generated I can't help
> wondering why it isn't more prominent in python.org content. Is the
> developer community completely disjoint with the web content editor
> community?
>
> If there is such a disconnect we should think about
14 matches
Mail list logo
