Hi,
Josiah Carlson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> Offering any hook for Py_FatalError may not even be enough, as some of
> those errors are caused by insufficient memory. What if a hook were
> available, but it couldn't be called because there wasn't enough memory?
>
>
Hi,
Josiah Carlson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> In looking at the use of Py_FatalError in the Python Sources (it's a 10
> meg tarball that is well worth the download), it looks as though its use
> shows a Fatal error (hence the name). Things like "Inconsistant
> intern
Hi,
Guido van Rossum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> Your efforts would be better directed towards fixing the causes of the
> fatal errors.
>
> I see no need to hook Py_FatalError, but since it's open source, you
> are of course free to patch your own copy if your urge is
Greetings,
Currently Py_FatalError only dumps the error to stderr and calls abort().
When doing quirky things with the interpreter, it's so annoying that process
just terminates. Are there any reason why we still dont have a simple
callback to hook Py_FatalError.
PS. If the answer is "because n
