[Python-Dev] Re: Necessary or not for enhancement of issue44097: “add configure option to control the groups of .pyc files to install”

PM To: python-dev@python.org Subject: [Python-Dev] Re: Necessary or not for enhancement of issue44097: “add configure option to control the groups of .pyc files to install” [Please note: This e-mail is from an EXTERNAL e-mail address] Hi Peixing, On Wed, 12 May 2021 09:27:46 +0000 "Xin, Peixi

[Python-Dev] Necessary or not for enhancement of issue44097: “add configure option to control the groups of .pyc files to install”

Hi , I created issue44097 for build enhancement: “add configure option to control the groups of .pyc files to install” and PR 23920 for the solution. From the only a few of comments I’ve got, someone thinks this enhancement makes sense. However, someone expressed opposition to this. So what is

[Python-Dev] Re: Pay for PR review and merging for VxWorks RTOS

Thank you. Tal. I will do some learning first then reach the group for problems. Thanks, Peixing From: Tal Einat Sent: Monday, August 10, 2020 3:22 PM To: Xin, Peixing Cc: Dong-hee Na ; Kyle Stanley ; python-dev@python.org; Meng, Bin ; Duan, Kun Subject: Re: [Python-Dev] Re: Pay for PR

[Python-Dev] Re: Pay for PR review and merging for VxWorks RTOS

t for reviewing use without connecting to CI? Thanks, Peixing -Original Message- From: Dong-hee Na Sent: Friday, August 7, 2020 4:01 PM To: Xin, Peixing Cc: Kyle Stanley ; python-dev@python.org; Meng, Bin ; Duan, Kun Subject: Re: [Python-Dev] Re: Pay for PR review and merging for Vx

[Python-Dev] Re: Pay for PR review and merging for VxWorks RTOS

done, we will connect the buildbot for VxWorks. Thanks, Peixing From: Kyle Stanley Sent: Thursday, August 6, 2020 9:27 AM To: Xin, Peixing Cc: python-dev@python.org; Meng, Bin Subject: Re: [Python-Dev] Pay for PR review and merging for VxWorks RTOS What exactly does the PR involve? Is it a

[Python-Dev] Pay for PR review and merging for VxWorks RTOS

Hi, Python developers: Anyone interested in PR review and merging for VxWorks RTOS? We can give a proper pay for that. Contact me if you have interest. Thanks, Peixing ___ Python-Dev mailing list -- python-dev@python.org To unsubscribe send an email t

[Python-Dev] Request for code review

Hi, I have several PRs pending there to get review for months. Anyone can help to review and do a merge? Thanks. https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/19447 https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/20254 https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/20256 https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/12670 bp

Re: [Python-Dev] checking "errno" for math operaton is safe to determine the error status?

errno" for math operaton is safe to determine the error status? Xin, Peixing wrote: > On certain platform, expm1() is implemented as exp() minus 1. To calculate > expm1(-1420.0), that will call exp(-1420.0) then substract 1. You know, > exp(-1420.0) will underflow to zero and errno is

Re: [Python-Dev] checking "errno" for math operaton is safe to determine the error status?

e overflow unexpectedly. Whose bug should it be scoped to? A bug of the platform? Isn't errno allowed to be set when calculation gets normal result? Thanks, Peixing -Original Message- From: Christian Heimes [mailto:christ...@python.org] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2019 8:24 PM To: Xin,

[Python-Dev] checking "errno" for math operaton is safe to determine the error status?

Hi, Math experts: Looking at the codes below, for many math operations, CPython is checking errno to determine the error status even though the math function returns normal value back. Is it a safe solution? From the description here http://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man3/errno.3.html and https:

[Python-Dev] how to rerun the job “Azure Pipelines PR”?

Hi, Experts: Anyone can tell how to rerun the job “Azure Pipelines PR” for my PR? Sometimes my PR failed but this is caused by externals. The next day this external issue was fixed then I might want to rerun this specific job on my PR to get the new result. How can I reach this? [cid:image001.

[Python-Dev] Anyone can help to review these 2 PRs?

Hi, Experts: I have 2 PRs to get review for days. Anyone can give your hands? Thanks in advance. BTW, they are about CPython working on VxWorks RTOS. https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/12394 https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/12428 Thanks, Peixing __

Re: [Python-Dev] Can I submit more support of standard library for VxWorks after 3.8.0 beta1?

Hi, Brett: Thanks for your comments. Yes, we want to submit more fixes on test_failures of stardard library after 3.8.0 beta1. Expect those can be accepted and get merged☺☺ Thanks, Peixing From: Brett Cannon [mailto:br...@python.org] Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2019 2:42 AM To: Xin, Peixing Cc

[Python-Dev] Can I submit more support of standard library for VxWorks after 3.8.0 beta1?

Hi, Experts: Seeing from the Python 3.8.0 schedule(https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0569/#schedule), new features will not be allowed to submit after 3.8.0 beta1. For VxWorks RTOS platform supporting CPython, we are using bpo-31904(https://bugs.python.org/issue31904) for PRs to submit our c

[Python-Dev] Anyone can help to proceed these 2 PRs?

Hi, Experts: I have 2 PRs pending there to get review for days. Anyone can give your hands? Thanks in advance. BTW, they are about CPython working on VxWorks 7. https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/12118 https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/12305 Thanks, Peixing ___