Hi Armin,
On 04.09.2015 02:29, Armin Rigo wrote:
Hi Valentine,
On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 9:15 PM, Valentine Sinitsyn
wrote:
That does not make it ok to have del called several time, does it?
That's a tricky question.
If the Python documentation now says something like ``the __del__
m
Hi Maciej,
On 04.09.2015 00:08, Maciej Fijalkowski wrote:
On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 9:23 AM, Valentine Sinitsyn
wrote:
Hi Armin,
On 25.08.2015 13:00, Armin Rigo wrote:
Hi Valentine,
On 25 August 2015 at 09:56, Valentine Sinitsyn
wrote:
Yes, I think so. There is a *highly obscure* corner
Hi Armin,
On 25.08.2015 13:00, Armin Rigo wrote:
Hi Valentine,
On 25 August 2015 at 09:56, Valentine Sinitsyn
wrote:
Yes, I think so. There is a *highly obscure* corner case: __del__
will still be called several times if you declare your class with
"__slots__=()".
Even on &quo
Hi Armin,
On 25.08.2015 13:00, Armin Rigo wrote:
Hi Valentine,
On 25 August 2015 at 09:56, Valentine Sinitsyn
wrote:
Yes, I think so. There is a *highly obscure* corner case: __del__
will still be called several times if you declare your class with
"__slots__=()".
Even on &quo
Hi Armin,
On 25.08.2015 12:51, Armin Rigo wrote:
Hi Valentine,
On 24 August 2015 at 20:43, Valentine Sinitsyn
wrote:
So you mean that this was to keep things backwards compatible for
third-party extensions? I haven't thought about it this way, but this makes
sense. However, the behavi
Hi Armin,
Thanks for replying.
On 23.08.2015 17:14, Armin Rigo wrote:
Hi Valentine,
On 19 August 2015 at 09:53, Valentine Sinitsyn
wrote:
why it wasn't possible to
implement proposed CI disposal scheme on top of tp_del?
I'm replying here as best as I understand the situation, w
eps/pep-0442/
2. https://docs.python.org/3/c-api/typeobj.html
--
Best regards,
Valentine Sinitsyn
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/pyt
