On 21 May 2012 03:36, Guido van Rossum wrote:
> [...]
>
> I have to agree with Christian that inspect.py is full of hacks and
> heuristics that would be fine in a module that's part of a user's app
> or even in a library, but stand out as brittle or outright unreliable
> in a stdlib module. Basic
Understood.
May I suggest that http://bugs.python.org/issue8767 be reopened, to make
things clear?
Stefano
On 26 April 2012 16:01, wrote:
> I'm looking into issue 1065986 [1], and in order to submit a patch I need
>> to know whether I have to take into account the eventuality that cpyhon
Hello every one,
I'm looking into issue 1065986 [1], and in order to submit a patch I need
to know whether I have to take into account the eventuality that cpyhon 2.7
be built without unicode support.
As far as I can see it is no longer possible to configure cpython 2.7 with
--disable-unicode as
