Hello!
Thanks for the decision, the points raised mostly make sense to me.
However, I find myself and a few others are a little confused by point 2. I
can read it as saying the following perhaps slightly contradictory things:
"It's good that PEP 677 is conservative and sticks to things Callable
oblems with pyproject.toml based builds.
Thank you to everyone who has already left comments, suggestions and reacts
on the Discuss thread! We welcome any further suggestions before submitting
to the Steering Council :-)
Thanks,
Shantanu Jain
Taneli Hu
@Paul
> ... missing resource is a central set of typing documentation that
includes examples, FAQs and best practices as well as reference materials
Like Sebastian, I agree, and this is something we're making progress on.
> ... easy way of testing that the stubs are correct
mypy ships with a to
Haskell and the MLs are older than I am and use "->" to mark their function
types (their functions are curried, but it clearly counts). Given the
overall influence functional languages have had on modern typing, their
influence making itself felt here would be unsurprising.
On Sat, 6 Mar 2021 at 0
patterns made it natural / easy to
support, it’s something to consider, either now or later a la PEP 614.
On Sat, 4 Jul 2020 at 19:15, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 5, 2020 at 12:03 PM Shantanu Jain
> wrote:
> > - Finally, I did mention increasing the scope of constant value p
a
> target, it's still far more verbose than any of them.
>
> On Sat, Jul 4, 2020 at 4:31 PM Shantanu Jain
> wrote:
>
>> Thank you for this PEP! Pattern matching is really exciting.
>>
>> As the PEP mentions and the thread evidences, the current dot syntax for
&
Thank you for this PEP! Pattern matching is really exciting.
As the PEP mentions and the thread evidences, the current dot syntax for
the “constant value pattern” is a tricky point. Given this, I thought I’d
throw another suggestion into the bikeshed.
Use percent placeholder to indicate lookup (o
Thank you for this PEP! Pattern matching is really exciting.
As the PEP mentions and the thread evidences, the current dot syntax for
the “constant value pattern” is a tricky point. Given this, I thought I’d
throw another suggestion into the bikeshed.
Use percent placeholder to indicate lookup (o
