>
> What would the semantics be of a super that intentially calls all siblings?
> In particular what is the return value of such a call? The implementation
> can't know how to combine the implementations in the inheritance chain and
> should refuse the tempation to guess.
I'll give you the exam
Exactly what Michael said. Stopping the chain going upwards is one
thing. Stopping it going sideways is another.
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 12:37 PM, Michael Foord
wrote:
> On 14/04/2011 16:34, P.J. Eby wrote:
>>
>> At 03:55 PM 4/14/2011 +0100, Michael Foord wrote:
>>>
>>> Ricardo isn't suggesting t
Hi all,
I recently stumbled upon an issue with a class in the mro chain not
calling super, therefore breaking the chain (ie, further base classes
along the chain didn't get called).
I understand it is currently a requirement that all classes that are
part of the mro chain behave and always call su
