pt., 8 paź 2021 o 04:48 S Pradeep Kumar napisał(a):
> ...
> Note that we considered and rejected using a full def-signature syntax like
>
> (record: PurchaseRecord, permissions: List[AuthPermission], /) ->
> FormattedItem
>
> because it would be more verbose for common cases and could l
czw., 12 lis 2020 o 19:41 Paul Sokolovsky napisał(a):
>
> Hello,
>
> On Thu, 12 Nov 2020 09:55:10 -0800
> Guido van Rossum wrote:
>
> > The position of PEP 622/634/535/636 authors is clear: we see this as a
> > necessary feature to support using enums (e.g. Color.RED) or constants
> > defined in
This is not a bug, this is correct behavior of any sql database.
2016-06-15 8:40 GMT+02:00 ninostephen mathew :
> Respected Developer(s),
> while writing a database module for one of my applications in python I
> encountered something interesting. I had a username and password field in my
> table
2013/9/12 Ethan Furman :
> On 09/11/2013 02:39 PM, Tim Delaney wrote:
>>
>>
>> I would think that retrieving the keys from the dict would return the
>> transformed keys (I'd
>> call them canonical keys).
>
>
> The more I think about this the more I agree. A canonicaldict with a key
> function that
2013/5/7 Ethan Furman :
> On 05/07/2013 08:01 AM, Piotr Duda wrote:
>>
>> 2013/5/7 Ethan Furman :
>>>
>>> On 05/07/2013 07:48 AM, Piotr Duda wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> What about adding simple syntax (I proposed thi
2013/5/7 Ethan Furman :
> On 05/07/2013 07:48 AM, Piotr Duda wrote:
>>
>>
>> What about adding simple syntax (I proposed this earlier, but no one
>> commented) that take care of assigning name and module, something
>> like:
>>
>> def name = express
2013/5/7 Eli Bendersky :
>
> 4) Using _getframe(N) here seems like an overkill to me. What we really need
> is just the module in which the current execution currently is (i.e. the
> metaclass's __new__ in our case). Would it make sense to add a new function
> somewhere in the stdlib of 3.4 (in sys
2013/5/3 Barry Warsaw :
> On May 03, 2013, at 07:40 PM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
>
>>The problem is that this is not an expression, it is a statement. The
>>advantage of the convenience function is not just that it is shorter, but
>>that it is an expression.
>
> Exactly right, but let's stop calling
2013/4/26 Nick Coghlan
>
> On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 8:29 AM, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> > On Apr 25, 2013, at 03:19 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
> >
> >>Clearly this is a trick question. :-)
> >
> > A bit, yes. :)
> >
> >>I was told when this was brought up previously (a week ago?) that it
> >>would be
