Steve Holden wrote:
> Contrast with the bleeding obvious:
>
> level = 0
> if "absolute_import" in self.futures:
> level = -1
>
> regards
> Steve
>
The issue that spawned the necessity of a ternary operator in the first
place was that this syntax is not usable at all in quit
Guido van Rossum wrote:
> After so many attempts to come up with an alternative for lambda,
> perhaps we should admit defeat. I've not had the time to follow the
> most recent rounds, but I propose that we keep lambda, so as to stop
> wasting everybody's talent and time on an impossible quest.
>
T
Christian Tanzer wrote:
> How about:
>
> def main_generator():
> ...
> yield * sub_generator()
>
> Ducking-ly yrs,
>
I like that one, but I'd stick the star to the generator (e.g. yield
*sub_generator), the meaning being to "unpack" the generator into the
yield, same as unpackin
states that many
windows flavour would be appreciable and that Win2003 may not be
extremely common), but i'd like to know how often it'll try to build,
and how long the build itself may take on such a platform.
Morel Xavier
___
Python-Dev ma
