Mark,
Thanks you this is an interesting proposal. I can see how many of the "magics"
provided by IPython/Jupyter could also be replaced by some of those macros.
A couple of questions – which I understand could be delegated to further
improvement to macros in a subsequent proposal.
- I'm no
It's still weird user experience as if you swap case .z and case z you don't
get the Unbound error anymore. SO it can work w/o global.
___
Python-Dev mailing list -- python-dev@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to python-dev-le...@python.org
https:
Hi All,
# Too long didn't read:
In 3.9 inspect.getdoc(instance) behavior was changed and does not return the
documentation of type(instance) or it's superclass(es) – I think this is a
problematic change of for some project and interactive use to get info on
objects that get rarely directly co
Is it possible to change some of those deprecation from Warn-by-default (but
can add a warning filter to make them error) to error-by-default (but can add a
filter to make them only warnings).
That way it is easy to fix large projects (even w/o modifying the source) in
only a couple of lines o
Is it possible to change some of those deprecation from Warn-by-default (but
can add a warning filter to make them error) to error-by-default (but can add a
filter to make them only warnings).
That way it is easy to fix large projects (even w/o modifying the source) in
only a couple of lines o
On Mon, 1 Oct 2018 at 13:38, Victor Stinner wrote:
> Le lun. 1 oct. 2018 à 22:32, Tres Seaver a écrit :
> > I'm pretty strongly -1 on the notion that folks who subscribe python-dev,
> > BPO, and the github repositories should need to *also* follow an
> > arbitrarily-growing set of Twitter accoun
On Mon, 4 Jun 2018 at 17:29, Ivan Pozdeev via Python-Dev <
python-dev@python.org> wrote:
> On 05.06.2018 3:09, Matthias Bussonnier wrote:
>
> This may even be a bug/feature of IPython,
>
> I see that inspect.signature(timedelta) fails, so if timedelta? says
> Init s
This may even be a bug/feature of IPython,
I see that inspect.signature(timedelta) fails, so if timedelta? says
Init signature: timedelta(self, /, *args, **kwargs)
Then this may be some IPython internal logic. The timedelta class seem to
use __new__ instead of __init__ (not sure why) and __new__
On Tue, 29 May 2018 at 08:43, Paul G wrote:
> This doesn't seem like the best idea, since it would kick off dozens or
> hundreds of builds for every commit to the master branch.
>
Sorry if I was unclear, I was not suggesting to do that for PRs against
master, but do that only for 2.7, 3.4 and 3.
> As I wrote, it became very difficult to merge any PR on 2.7 because of
> that. We all run a race to be the first one to merge a change into
> 2.7. The next one will get a "conflict" even if the merged commit is
> unrelated (as I described: two different unrelated directories).
Couldn't miss-isli
On Fri, 4 May 2018 at 11:49, Serhiy Storchaka wrote:
> 04.05.18 20:57, Matthias Bussonnier пише:
> > But when I hit a DeprecationWarning message there is one crucial piece of
> > information missing most of the time: Since which version number it's
> > deprecated
> &
I would like to take a step back,
I think that for removal of feature you need to make sure that the "old
way" is
not common enough. I think that in many context, users of Python see
DeprecationWarnings as a stick. A deprecation warning means you'll have to
do
some work. A pep or a document that l
On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 9:21 AM, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 9:42 PM, Roberto Martínez
> wrote:
>> I am having a hard time trying to choose one of this two products:
>>
>> Phyton 27:
>> http://www.amazon.com/Phyton-27-Systemic-Bactericide-Fungicide/dp/B00VKPL8FU
>> Phyton 35:
>>
Hi all,
> On Feb 27, 2016, at 14:21, Alexander Walters wrote:
>
> Can we even ask github to pull it down and reasonably expect them to comply?
> Their entire model is built on everyone forking everyone else.
Why the model is everyone forking, some of the help page of GitHub actually
tell y
> On Feb 8, 2016, at 06:40, Victor Stinner wrote:
>
> 2016-02-08 15:32 GMT+01:00 Victor Stinner :
>> Since 3.3, functions of the os module started to emit
>> DeprecationWarning when called with bytes filenames.
>> (...)
>> Recently, an user complained that os.walk() doesn't work with bytes on
>>
> On Feb 4, 2016, at 08:22, Sven R. Kunze wrote:
>
> On 04.02.2016 16:57, Matthias Bussonnier wrote:
>>> On Feb 3, 2016, at 13:22, Yury Selivanov wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> An ideal way would be to calculate a hit/miss ratio over time
>>>
> On Feb 3, 2016, at 13:22, Yury Selivanov wrote:
>
>
> An ideal way would be to calculate a hit/miss ratio over time
> for each cached opcode, but that would be an expensive
> calculation.
Do you mean like a sliding windows ?
Otherwise if you just want a let's say 20% miss threshold, you incr
> On Oct 29, 2015, at 11:46, Laura Creighton wrote:
>
> In a message of Thu, 29 Oct 2015 18:27:59 +, Paul Moore writes:
>> The idle issues seem to me to demonstrate that shadowing the stdlib is
>> a bad idea. Of course, consenting adults, and if you override you're
>> responsible for correct
18 matches
Mail list logo
