ith regards to urllib as a whole. Thanks so much!
--
Lincoln Auster
they/them
___
Python-Dev mailing list -- python-dev@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to python-dev-le...@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-de
h I wasn't taking them in as a webservice. Deleting the
> library would break this code. :(
+1. If urllib is removed, I would very much like to preserve at least
the functionality of urlparse /somewhere/.
--
Lincoln Auster
they/them
___
Python-Dev ma
tributed like that. If a given script cannot rely on the presence of
some given module --- one which may need to be installed as though it
were just another 3rd-party component --- then it's not really all that
standard, is it?
--
Lincoln Auster
they/them
_
t from a firm and semi-formal (re)definition of scope
(hopefully in a manner motivated by real code). After that, it would
probably benefit from patching up all the rough spots in the
implementation side of things. To keep the metaphor going, let's
recharge our dead batteries.
--
lincoln auster
th
Hi,
When attempting to build and run doctests for cpython on FreeBSD, I got
a vague error from the default BSD make. gmake, of course, ran fine. Is
GNU make the only supported make implementation? If so, did I miss that
in the devguide, or should that be in there somewhere?
--
Lincoln Auster
useful if a bit fragile. I wouldn't consider my
PR to be in conflict with any ongoing scope reconsideration (though
deprecation is, of course, another matter entirely).
Thanks for any feedback and review!
--
Lincoln Auster
They/Them
___
Python-D
