machine) and have a shared data path between them, based on shared
memory allocated at configuration time.
Cheers
Steven H. Rogers wrote:
> Krishna Sankar wrote:
>
>> Folks,
>>As a follow-up to the py3k discussions started by Bruce and Guido, I
>> pinged Brett and
Agreed it is not a PEP yet. Hence the word "Exploration" in front of it.
This ia domain which needs some discussions before developing a good
PEP. May be I should call it a PEPlet ;o)
Cheers
Guido van Rossum wrote:
> On 9/18/07, Krishna Sankar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wro
Justin,
Yep, trying out an implementation is a good way. Please share your
thoughts as and when you are ready.
Cheers & good luck
Justin Tulloss wrote:
>
>
> On 9/18/07, *Krishna Sankar* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
>
> Fol
the
"pragmatic" section.
Happy to hear that you are open to PVM changes. It will not be asked
unless and until we all are crisp about it.
Cheers
Guido van Rossum wrote:
> On 9/18/07, Krishna Sankar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Folks,
>>As a
-core
architectures
Version: $Revision$
Last-Modified: $Date$
Author: Krishna Sankar ,
Status: Wandering ! (as in "Not all those who wander are lost ..."
-J.R.R.Tolkien)
Type: Process
Content-Type: text/x-rst
Created: 15-Sep-2007
Abstract
This proposal aims at leveraging the multi-cor
