Martin,
What is the rationale behind using an MSI ? Has anyone attempted to create
a Python installer using something a bit simpler, like NSIS [
http://nsis.sourceforge.net/Main_Page]? If not, what are the reasons?
Joe
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 3:03 PM, "Martin v. Löwis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote
will create an issue if deemed necessary.
Joseph Armbruster
*exceptions.KeyError*:
Debugging information follows
1. While evaluating the standard:'request/batch' expression on line 23
Current variables:
*templates*
*repeat* *false*0 *context* *
utils* *db* *not
I am not a developer but i'm interested in browsing it. Is it
possible to be added?
On Jan 10, 2008 10:57 AM, Christian Heimes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Neal Norwitz wrote:
> > I think only Coverity can add people. You can send them a message if
> > you would like to be added: [EMAIL PROTECTE
1.__str__()
File "", line 1
1.__str__()
^
SyntaxError: invalid syntax
>>> 1 .__str__()
'1'
Joseph Armbruster
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
lect Search and Python 2.6, I
retrieved 208 open bugs. At a quick glance, I found two that were windows,
but not tagged appropriately. If it's worthwhile, I can spend some time
this evening browsing the list of current 2.6 bugs to see if there are any
duplicates, collisions, etc.
Joseph Armbrus
Is svn.python.org ok? I am unable to perform an update at the moment.
Joseph Armbruster
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python
I am unable to reproduce this in windows with:
Python 3.0a2 (py3k:59584M, Dec 20 2007, 16:24:12) [MSC v.1500 32 bit
(Intel)] on win32
Running the test via rt and in isolation does not appear to fail. In
isolation produces 16 OKs.
Joe
On Dec 20, 2007 3:58 PM, Guido van Rossum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
All,
I posted this up to comp.lang.python earlier today and asked a few questions
around IRC. The general consensus appeared to be that this was a bug. Before
opening up an issue on it, I wanted to run it by this list first (just in case)
Here is a copy / paste from comp.lang.python:
URL:
Should these two issues be consolidated? It looks as if they are attacking
the same problem.
Thoughts?
Joseph Armbruster
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http
I was playing around with sliceobject.c this evening and noticed the following
behavior. If you slice with a step 0, you receive a ValueError but when you
slice with a step of None, the step is set to 1. As an example, observe the
following interactive session:
>>> a = [1,2,3,4,5,6]
>>> b
All,
Not sure if this is significant or not but the spacing of the builtin_format
function is not consistent with the
rest of the bltinmodule.c file.
Joseph Armbruster
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman
All,
I was looking at statsvn today at work and gave it a test-run on a repo there.
I wondered what it would look like for python3k. And... here are the results:
http://www.joevial.com/statsvn/
Enjoy,
Joseph Armbruster
___
Python-Dev mailing list
submit a patch in a few. I have a few hours before turkey time :-)
Good Day!
Joseph Armbruster
Christian Heimes wrote:
> Just for your information: I've back-ported the PCbuild9 directory from
> py3k to the trunk. You now can build Python 2.6 and 3.0 with the new
> Visual Studio 2008.
own a single license :-) It
seems like most people in the community do not have ready-access to one,
so I figured this could be a benefit.
Let me know,
Mr. Joseph Armbruster
Mike wrote:
> Dear Ms. Armbruster,
>
> Steve Holden thought I should contact you. We are working on
> develo
verify everything is reasonably good.
I would like to seek insight from the team as to what steps I could take
next to verify my box is ready to go and make it be used.
Thank You,
Joseph Armbruster
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http
ached. Probably my biggest question now is the use of
GetVersion as opposed to GetVersionEx. According to the MSDN, it doesn't
appear to be all that undesirable:
http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms724451.aspx
Your thoughts?
Joseph Armbruster
Joseph Armbruster wrote:
Mark,
Sounds good,
Mark,
Sounds good, I will get patching tonight. Any thoughts on CreateProcessW ?
Joseph Armbruster
On 6/4/07, Mark Hammond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> All,
>
> I wanted to pass this one around before opening an issue on it.
> When running the unit test for popen via r
W and am interested in
questioning whether or not this has a place in posixmodule?
Any on yet another note, when I ran test_popen.py straight from /lib
(using my std::Python25 install, I obtained the following debug output
in the same statement of interest)
data=['-c', 'foo
supplying future patches.
Joseph Armbruster
On 5/31/07, Fred L. Drake, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Saturday 26 May 2007, Joseph Armbruster wrote:
> I noticed that one of the parts of ConfigParser was not using "for line
> in fp" style of readline-ing :-) So, this w
Kristján,
Whoops! My apologies. In any case, I created the bugs in the sf issue
tracker for proper CM practice. Look under the patches section within
sf.net.
You should go ahead and close out the 2005 build ones then, once applied :-)
Thank you again,
Joseph Armbruster
Kristján Valur
Kristján,
Here is a part of the patch that I was referring to. Something to that
effect.
Joseph Armbruster
Index: Lib/ConfigParser.py
===
--- Lib/ConfigParser.py (revision 55600)
+++ Lib/ConfigParser.py (working copy)
@@ -441,10
f practice appears in several other places.
There is a possibility of good savings in this department. If you think
this is worthwhile, I can create one large patch for them all.
I sure hope I am not missing something fundamental with this one...
Joseph Armbruster
Index: Lib/Confi
Kristján,
I started to investigate the WINVER warnings that are scattered
throughout the VS 2005 build. This patch eliminates them but I may have
overlooked the intentions of the #include ordering. If this invalid,
please let me know.
Patch attached.
Joseph Armbruster
Kristján Valur
ith the /TC argument?
Joseph Armbruster
Index: PCbuild8/pythoncore/pythoncore.vcproj
===
--- PCbuild8/pythoncore/pythoncore.vcproj (revision 55600)
+++ PCbuild8/pythoncore/pythoncore.vcproj (working copy)
ot; for more information.
a = "monty"
a
'monty'
Python 2.5 Session with flag:
python -U
Python 2.5 (r25:51908, Sep 19 2006, 09:52:17) [MSC v.1310 32 bit (Intel)] on
win32
Type "help", "copyright", "credit
25 matches
Mail list logo
