On Sat, 13 Jun 2009 12:33:46 + (UTC)
Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> This proposal looks reasonable to me. Please note that it's too late for 3.1
> anyway - we're in release candidate phase. Once you have a patch, you can post
> it on the bug tracker.
Thanks I will do that. Sometime in the next cou
tion. If the
buffer contents is less than n, buffer an additional chunk from the
"raw" stream before hand. If EOF is encountered during any raw read
then return as much as we can up to n. (maybe I should write that in
code form??)
Thanks
Frederick Reeve
side of parsers, so speed in read-through
and random reads would not have to be affected.
I have other reasons and arguments, but I want to know what every one
else thinks. This will most likely show me what I have missed or am
not seeing, if anything. Please I have babbled enough.
Thanks so m
