[Guido van Rossum]
> I like the solution that puts a bare "raise" at the top of the except
> clause.
Yes. Clean and simple enough. Thanks all! :-)
--
François Pinard http://pinard.progiciels-bpi.ca
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
[Guido van Rossum]
> [François Pinard]
>
> > It happens once in a while that I want to comment out the except
> > clauses of a try statement, when I want the traceback of the inner
> > raising, for debugging purposes. Syntax forces me to also comment
> > the `try:' line, and indent out the lines
[Guido van Rossum]
> [Nick Coghlan]
> > > What does a try statement with neither an except clause nor a
> > > finally clause mean?
> [Greg Ewing]
>
> > I guess it would mean the same as
> >if 1:
> > ...
> I strongly disagree with this. [...]
Allow me a quick comment on this issue.
I
[Guido van Rossum]
> But I realized (1) any() and all() read much better in their natural
> context (an if statement), and there's no confusion there;
I do not think builtins should read good in some statement contexts and
bad in the others, or designed to be legible in only a few contexts.
This
