Re: [Python-Dev] Windows buildbots MSVC RTL popups

2010-08-30 Thread Florent Xicluna
issue # 1868 my .2 cents, -- Florent Xicluna 2010/8/30 David Bolen : > Since the recent history of my two Windows buildbots has turned ugly, > I figured I'd mention that they both (XP and Windows 7) have started > generating quite a few GUI C++ RTL runtime pop-up assertions, wh

Re: [Python-Dev] Summary of Python tracker Issues

2010-08-20 Thread Florent Xicluna
osts a cron job which recalculates and upload the JSON data. Currently, the report is uploaded every hour. Regards, -- Florent Xicluna 2010/8/20 Python tracker > > ACTIVITY SUMMARY (2010-08-13 - 2010-08-20) > Python tracker at http://bugs.python.org/ > > To view or respond to any

[Python-Dev] bbreport users - please upgrade

2010-08-16 Thread Florent Xicluna
cache will not be updated, but future builds should be parsed correctly. - there's no documentation yet (except ./bbreport.py --help) -- Florent Xicluna ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-

Re: [Python-Dev] Tracker status

2010-08-03 Thread Florent Xicluna
There's no new issue posted this morning. I tried to post an issue, and an error occurred on submit. So... -- Florent 2010/8/3 Fred Drake > On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 1:01 AM, Ray Allen wrote: > > Is the tracker OK now? > > It's working for me. > > > -Fred > > -- > Fred L. Drake, Jr. > "A

Re: [Python-Dev] Fixing the GIL (with a BFS scheduler)

2010-05-17 Thread Florent Xicluna
2010/5/16 Nir Aides > > *What can be done with it?* > > Here are some options: > 1) Abandon it - no one is interested, yawn. > 2) Take ideas and workarounds from its code and apply to other patches. > 3) Include it in the interpreter as an auxiliary (turn on with a runtime > switch) scheduler. >

Re: [Python-Dev] bbreport

2010-04-18 Thread Florent Xicluna
> Does it really need trunk?  I've been running it under 2.6 without > problems, but I probably haven't explored all the options fully. > Now it works on 2.6 (or 2.5+pysqlite). Regards, -- Florent ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http

Re: [Python-Dev] skip all TestCase methods if resource is not available

2010-04-01 Thread Florent Xicluna
2010/4/1 anatoly techtonik: > On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 8:02 PM, Florent Xicluna wrote: (...) >> >> Put it in unittest.TestCase.setUp() method. It should be enough. > > It fails with error instead if skip, as it should according to > http://docs.python.o

Re: [Python-Dev] skip all TestCase methods if resource is not available

2010-04-01 Thread Florent Xicluna
2010/4/1 anatoly techtonik: > Currently it is possible to mark individual test methods with: >test_support.requires('network') > > However, sometimes it is necessary to skip the whole TestCase if > 'network' resource is not available counting the number of skipped > tests at the same ti

Re: [Python-Dev] Add -3 and -Wd to the buildbots

2010-03-31 Thread Florent Xicluna
2010/3/31 Brett Cannon: > On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 07:58, Ezio Melotti wrote: >> Hi, >> now that the py3k warnings are fixed (see >> http://bugs.python.org/issue7092) we should run the tests on the trunk >> buildbots with the -3 flags, in order to check if new warnings are >> introduced and possibly

Re: [Python-Dev] Deprecation warnings in Python 2.7

2010-03-03 Thread Florent Xicluna
2010/3/3 Florent Xicluna : > >>>> u'\xff' == bytearray('\xff')    # It should raise an error because of '-bb' > __main__:1: BytesWarning: Comparison between bytearray and string > False >>>> u'\xff' == '\xff' > _

Re: [Python-Dev] Deprecation warnings in Python 2.7

2010-03-03 Thread Florent Xicluna
2010/3/3 Raymond Hettinger : > > -1 for several reasons. > 1) We've advertised -3 as part of TheOneTrueWay(tm).  It's a core part of > our transition story, so we should keep that as clean/consistent as > possible.  Deprecating the -3 switch seems like shooting ourselves in the > foot. Instead of

Re: [Python-Dev] Deprecation warnings in Python 2.7

2010-03-02 Thread Florent XICLUNA
2010/3/3 Florent Xicluna wrote: > > I will post a list of the DeprecationWarnings in the python trunk, in a > followup message, for a review, and to help the discussion. > Here is the list of the "Classic" DeprecationWarnings: http://paste.pocoo.org/show/184931/ And

[Python-Dev] Deprecation warnings in Python 2.7

2010-03-02 Thread Florent Xicluna
ems normal to consider the migration from 2.7 to 3.1 and show these warnings when the developer uses "-Wd" switch. What do you expect as DeprecationWarning in 2.7? I will post a list of the DeprecationWarnings in the python trunk, in a followup message, for a review, and to help the

Re: [Python-Dev] Update xml.etree.ElementTree for Python 2.7 and 3.2

2010-02-28 Thread Florent XICLUNA
2010/2/28 Stefan Behnel > I would actually encourage Florent to do the opposite: act now and prepare > a patch against the latest official ET 1.2 and cET releases (or their SVN > version respectively) that integrates everything that is considered safe, > i.e. everything that makes cET compatible

Re: [Python-Dev] contributor to committer

2010-02-26 Thread Florent Xicluna
Hello, > > +1 > Thanks all, for your warm welcome. > > The usual caveats apply though: > - don't get carried away with the privileges > - even core devs still put patches on the tracker sometimes > - if in doubt, ask for advice on python-dev (or IRC) > - make sure to su

[Python-Dev] contributor to committer

2010-02-24 Thread Florent Xicluna
and port it to Python 2.7 (#6472). As a final note, I would like to highlight a small script in the same spirit as Pyflakes: pep8.py I've contributed few patches for the version 0.5, released a week ago: http://pypi.python.org/pypi/pep8/ -- Florent Xi

Re: [Python-Dev] 'languishing' status for the tracker

2010-02-22 Thread Florent Xicluna
ybe these 2 documentation entry points could be merged and improved, first. They are not available on the same menu, and there's no cross-link between them: * "Issue workflow" from http://www.python.org/dev/ * "Tracker documentation" from http://bugs.python.org/ -- F

Re: [Python-Dev] Update xml.etree.ElementTree for Python 2.7 and 3.2

2010-02-20 Thread Florent Xicluna
Martin v. Löwis v.loewis.de> writes: > > > If the goals of Python ElementTree and Fredrik ElementTree diverge I don't > > see a problem with an amicable fork. > > I see one: Fredrik will not consider such a fork amicable. Of course, if > you could make him state in public that he is fine with a

Re: [Python-Dev] Update xml.etree.ElementTree for Python 2.7 and 3.2

2010-02-20 Thread Florent Xicluna
Stefan Behnel behnel.de> writes: > > Florent Xicluna, 18.02.2010 10:21: > > For this purpose, I grew the test suite from 300 lines to 1800 lines, > > using both the tests from upstream and the tests proposed by Neil Muller > > on issue #6232. > > Just a comment

Re: [Python-Dev] deprecated stuff in standard library

2010-02-19 Thread Florent Xicluna
Eric Smith trueblade.com> writes: > > This is because no one has gotten around to it. Create a bug report for > it, and preferably attach a patch with tests. > > Eric. > Actually, it gives py3k warning about "mhlib" + 2 others warnings: ./python/release26-maint/ $ ./python -Wd -3 -c "import

[Python-Dev] Update xml.etree.ElementTree for Python 2.7 and 3.2

2010-02-18 Thread Florent Xicluna
he patch covers documentation, too. http://codereview.appspot.com/207048/show It's time to comment and review. The proposed plan is to merge the patch in trunk before 2.7 alpha4. Best regards, -- Florent Xicluna ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python