Bob Ippolito пишет:
> Well you simply can't do what you propose without writing code in the
> style of Twisted or with interpreter modifications or evil stack
> slicing such as with stackless or greenlet. If you aren't willing to
> choose any of those then you'll have to live without that
> functi
Josiah Carlson пишет:
>writing of a scheduler and the execution of scheduled tasks in a
>scheduler? If so, you can implement it today (I would suggest using the
>heapq module, and/or the pair heap I posted to this list a few weeks ago),
>or you can use a previously existing mainloop for handling
Mike Klaas пишет:
> I'm not sure how having python execute code at an arbitrary time would
> _reduce_ race conditions and/or deadlocks. And if you want to make it
> safe by executing code that shares no variables or resources, then it
> is no less safe to use threads, due to the GIL.
>
Ok. And wha
The question to python core developers:
Is there any plans to implement non-blocking timer like a
threading.Timer() but without thread?
Some interpreted languages (like Tcl or Erlang) have such functionality,
so I think it would be a great
feature in Python :)
The main goal is to prevent threads
