> Winpdb is *exactly* what you asked for, so if it's not what you're looking
> for you'll need to be more specific about what you want that it doesn't
> do...
>
> James
>
Fair enough, I was assuming that winpdb didn't have a command line interface,
but I was mistaken (rpdb2).
In any case, I would
all,
I'I was wondering if there was a command line python debugger that was
able to attach to an existing process. I'd very much like to be able
to debug over a ssh session using screen.
Ed
(ps - and yes, I know about winpdb, etc... that is not exactly what
I'm looking for..)
___
> On-topic would have been a disussion of which of these features would
> be useful for the trace module to be built-in, how to best provide them,
> along with an offer to produce a patch.
Ok, fair enough - which of the features listed (indentation matching
stacklevel, output to a file (or files w
All,
I've been looking at the trace module, and although it looks useful, I'm
surprised that there aren't a couple of features that I would have thought
would be fairly basic. So, does trace support (for the --trace option):
- indentation tracking stacklevel (where each function is prefixed
