On Tue, 2021-08-17 at 12:14 +0100, Irit Katriel wrote:
>
> On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 12:05 PM Duncan Grisby
> wrote:
> > I don't know if it is pertinent to this at all, but I
> > raised https://bugs.python.org/issue9 in which the faulthandler
> > modu
quot;the
> code has changed since you observed the problem and we fixed things
> that could have caused it. Please open a new issue if you still see
> this bug".
That's fair. I'll do my best to reproduce it and see which (if either)
change resolves it.
Duncan.
--
Duncan G
; I personally agree with Irit, voting +1 for Option 3 since the old
> macros were soft-deprecated already by introducing new macros in 3.8,
> and more importantly made incompatible with pre-3.8 usage.
>
> Let's talk on how to proceed.
>
> - Ł
--
Duncan Grisby
On Monday 28 November, Guido van Rossum wrote:
> On 11/24/05, Duncan Grisby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I have encountered a problem with the re module. I have a
> > multi-threaded program that does lots of regular expression searching,
> > with some relatively
t would prevent it
being re-entered, or know for certain that there isn't?
Cheers,
Duncan.
--
-- Duncan Grisby --
-- [EMAIL PROTECTED] --
-- http://www.grisby.org --
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python
o the interpreter lock could
be released. Has anyone tried to do that?
Thanks,
Duncan.
--
-- Duncan Grisby --
-- [EMAIL PROTECTED] --
-- http://www.grisby.org --
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/ma
