2009/9/18 Peter Moody :
> On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 6:17 PM, Andrew McNamara
> wrote:
>>>off to patch the pep and implement some of the non controversial changes.
>>
>> It might be a good idea to add some use-cases to the PEP.
>
> There are several use-cases in the PEP already.
>
> The problem is, f
2008/4/29 "Martin v. Löwis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Same here. In fact, is there a good reason to have mkstemp() return the
> > fd (except backward compatibility)?
>
> Except for backwards compatibility: is there a good reason to keep
> os.mkstemp at all?
Greg Ewing's use-case is one I've also
