Ron Adam writes:
> While playing around with the example bytes class I noticed code reads
> much better when I use methods called tounicode and tostring.
[...]
> I'm not suggesting we start using to-type everywhere, just where it
> might make things clearer over decode and encode.
+1
I alwa
Phillip writes:
> IMO, it's simpler to handle this use case by letting __conform__
return
> None, since this allows people to follow the One Obvious Way to not
conform
> to a particular protocol.
>
> Then, there isn't a need to even worry about the exception name in the
> first place, either...
> Why not just subscribe to
> python-checkins and filter out everything *but* nondist/peps?
But there are lots of people who might be interested in
following PEP updates but not other checkins. Pretty
much anyone who considers themselves a "user" of Python
not a developer. Perhaps they don't even
