On 11/4/09, sstein...@gmail.com wrote:
> Maybe the 3.x line should just be put out of our misery, merged back
> to 2.7, 2.8, 2.9, and proceed as Glyph suggested in passing with
> increasing levels of deprecation until it just turns into 3.x on its
> own by running out of numbers.
As a user, I'm
>> Do the users get any say in this?
>
> I'm a user! :-)
>
> I hate calling methods on string literals, I think it looks very odd to
> have code like this:
>
> "Displaying {0} of {1} revisions".format(x, y)
>
> Will we be able to write this as
>
> "Displaying {0} of {1} revisions" % (x, y)
>
>
