that the tool won't
touch *anything* that has to do with the str->bytes/unicode->str move (I
assumed that meant it wouldn't touch "unicode" in the snippet I gave
above), right?
Will the tool also make the following work cor
"[a]nything having to do with the
str->bytes/unicode->str move is so far off-limits" to the upgrade tool.
--
Bob Kline
http://www.rksystems.com
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python
stence
on "the GUI is the OOWTDI" even for such administrative tasks as
installing system-wide software).
--
Bob Kline
http://www.rksystems.com
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailm
Mike Meyer wrote:
> I think lxml is the best Python XML library that meets his
> requirements, and it would make my life a lot easier if it were part
> of the standard library.
+1 (!)
--
Bob Kline
http://www.rksystems.com
mailto:[EMAIL
Bob Kline wrote:
> Christian Heimes wrote:
>
>> Is VS 2008 recent enought for you? :]
>>
>>
>
> Yes, thanks! I would hope Microsoft has fixed that bug by now. :-)
>
And yes, indeed, the bug is gone in Python 2.6.
--
Bob Kline
http://www.rksy
Christian Heimes wrote:
> Bob Kline wrote:
>
>> Any possibility of revisiting this question (upgrading to a more recent
>> compiler for Windows builds of Python)?
>>
>
> The latest alphas of Python 2.6 and 3.0 are build with VS 2088. I've
> spent
iting this question (upgrading to a more recent
compiler for Windows builds of Python)?
--
Bob Kline
http://www.rksystems.com
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/lis
