Congratulations!
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on
25/06/2006 13:07:01:
> The PyPy development team has been busy working and we've now packaged
> our latest improvements, completed work and new experiments as
> version 0.9.0, our fourth public release.
>
> The highlights of this fourth release of P
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on
25/04/2006 13:22:27:
> "Neil Hodgson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Martin v. Löwis:
> >
> >> Apparently, the status of this changed right now: it seems that
> >> the 2003 compiler is not available anymore; the page now says
> >> that it was replaced with the 2005
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on
30/03/2006 11:38:30:
> Jack Diederich wrote:
>
> > Classes have a unique property in that they are the easiest way to
make
> > little namespaces in python.
>
> For a while now, I've been wondering whether it would
> be worth having a construct purely for creating lit
Michael Hudson wrote on 03/02/2006 09:36:30:
>
> Hmm.
>
> >>> funcTakingCallback(lamda x:x.method(zip, zop))
> >>> funcTakingCallback(methodcaller("method", zip, zop))
>
> I'm not sure which of these is clearer really. Are lambdas so bad?
> (FWIW, I haven't internalized itemgetter/attrgetter y
