e
website soon. 3.9.10 was released approximately one day after the commit
was made.
Regards,
Adrian Freund
On 3/15/22 18:43, Prasad, PCRaghavendra wrote:
Hi Team,
Can someone please let us know the release date of Python 3.9.11 (
with libexpat 2.4.8 security issues fixed )
In the python.org
TERMUX_PKG_SUGGESTS="python-tkinter"
Finally just run "./build-package.sh -i -f python" and send
"output/python*.deb" to your phone, where you can install it using dpkg -i.
Adrian
On 9/16/21 14:27, Adrian Freund wrote:
As you are using termux it might be worth
As you are using termux it might be worth checking out the build
arguments and patches termux uses to build their own version of python
(Currently 3.9.7):
https://github.com/termux/termux-packages/tree/master/packages/python
I'm not sure if this will be enough to build python3.10 or if additio
On 4/22/21 5:00 PM, Paul Moore wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Apr 2021 at 15:22, Adrian Freund wrote:
>> On April 22, 2021 3:15:27 PM GMT+02:00, Paul Moore
>> wrote:
>>> but that's *absolutely* as far as I'd want to go. Note in particular
>>> that I don't w
On April 22, 2021 3:15:27 PM GMT+02:00, Paul Moore wrote:
>On Thu, 22 Apr 2021 at 13:23, Adrian Freund wrote:
>>
>> According to PEP 484 all missing annotations in checked functions should be
>> handled as Any. Any is compatible with all types.
>
>Yep, that's
ame':
g(t[1])
You could statically type t as Union[Tuple[Literal['version'], int],
Tuple[Literal['name'], str]], but inferring a Protocol for this would be either
very hard or even impossible, especially with even more complex conditions.
Adrian Freund
On A
ouldn't be backported to versions before the
typing syntax was relaxed, unless explicitly wrapped in a string, but I would
imagine that if we see a relaxed annotation syntax we might see new typing
syntax every now and then after that.
Adrian Freund
On April 18, 2021 6:49:59 PM GMT+02:00,
s slowed, adding a type
checker to the standard library might be useful, but in my opinion it would
currently do more harm than good.
Adrian Freund
On April 13, 2021 11:55:05 PM GMT+02:00, Luciano Ramalho
wrote:
>Hugh was unfortunate in presenting the problem, but I agree that we
>sho
ore general type could be chosen instead.
I don't have any objections against the other parts of the PEP.
Adrian Freund
On 3/27/21 2:37 PM, Mark Shannon wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> As the 3.10 beta is not so far away, I've cut down PEP 653 down to the
> minimum needed for
Here's another suggestion:
PEP 593 introduced the `Annotated` type annotation. This could be used to
annotate a TypeGuard like this:
`def is_str_list(val: List[object]) -> Annotated[bool, TypeGuard(List[str])]`
Note that I used ( ) instead of [ ] for the TypeGuard, as it is no longer a
type.
10 matches
Mail list logo