This is the point where the pricey support contract comes in. Would give
options to those who need it and provide some revenue.
Otherwise, the "there's no such thing as a free lunch," factor takes precedence.
-Mike
___
Python-Dev mailing list --
On Thu, Nov 18, 2021 at 2:25 PM Guido van Rossum wrote:
> I know PEP 646 was one of these.
>
I purposefully didn't "out" anyone, but yes. 😄
> In our defense, we *did* notify the SC that there was a pending issue (
> https://github.com/python/steering-council/issues/59#issuecomment-951728233),
ACTIVITY SUMMARY (2021-11-12 - 2021-11-19)
Python tracker at https://bugs.python.org/
To view or respond to any of the issues listed below, click on the issue.
Do NOT respond to this message.
Issues counts and deltas:
open7290 ( +8)
closed 50286 (+45)
total 57576 (+53)
Open issues w
Thanks, Brett. We'll notify you once we've resolved the issue.
On Thu, 18 Nov 2021 at 19:30, Brett Cannon wrote:
> I put the PEP back on our agenda to discuss this.
>
> On Wed, Nov 17, 2021 at 2:40 PM Guido van Rossum wrote:
>
>> Hi Barry,
>>
>> That's fantastic news!
>>
>> Somewhat embarrassin
